On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 at 15:59, Maxime Ripard <maxime@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > We'll need to have the HVS binding before the HDMI controllers so that > we can check whether the firmware allows to run in 4kp60. Reorder a bit > the component list, and document the current constraints we're aware of. > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@xxxxxxxxxx> Based on my understanding of bind ordering this makes sense, but I don't consider myself an expert there. Acked-by: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.c | 11 ++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.c > index 556ad0f02a0d..0310590ee66e 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.c > @@ -303,12 +303,21 @@ static const struct component_master_ops vc4_drm_ops = { > .unbind = vc4_drm_unbind, > }; > > +/* > + * This list determines the binding order of our components, and we have > + * a few constraints: > + * - The TXP driver needs to be bound before the PixelValves (CRTC) > + * but after the HVS to set the possible_crtc field properly > + * - The HDMI driver needs to be bound after the HVS so that we can > + * lookup the HVS maximum core clock rate and figure out if we > + * support 4kp60 or not. > + */ > static struct platform_driver *const component_drivers[] = { > + &vc4_hvs_driver, > &vc4_hdmi_driver, > &vc4_vec_driver, > &vc4_dpi_driver, > &vc4_dsi_driver, > - &vc4_hvs_driver, > &vc4_txp_driver, > &vc4_crtc_driver, > &vc4_v3d_driver, > -- > 2.29.2 > _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel