Ilia Mirkin, Wed, Feb 24, 2021 17:57:41 +0100: > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 11:53 AM Alex Riesen <alexander.riesen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Ilia Mirkin, Wed, Feb 24, 2021 17:48:39 +0100: > > > Just to be crystal clear -- are you saying that 128x128 works or does > > > not work? (You said "yes", which would imply it works OK, but then you > > > said both cases, which would imply doesn't work since 256x256 doesn't > > > work?) > > > > Modetest with 128x128 cursor works. Without damage to the cursor: modetest > > shows normal cursor in vanilla v5.11. Modetest also shows normal cursor in > > vanilla v5.11 with the commit reverted. > > But modetest with 256x256 doesn't work (correctly) right? Or did I > misunderstand? Right. That's why I was asking if I did everything right: it was just corrupted in both kernels. > All the patch does is allow those large cursors to be used, which gets > reported via drm APIs and modesetting picks the largest cursor > available. (And actually I think it's even not required to use the > large cursors, it just controls what's reported in the defaults to > userspace.) Maybe something in X code is not prepared to handle the kernel reporting large cursor support? Even though 128x128 is pretty large, and I don't think I even use that large cursors in X configuration. How can I check? _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
