[AMD Public Use] > -----Original Message----- > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 1:00 AM > To: Lin, Wayne <Wayne.Lin@xxxxxxx> > Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Brol, Eryk <Eryk.Brol@xxxxxxx>; Zhuo, Qingqing <Qingqing.Zhuo@xxxxxxx>; > stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Zuo, Jerry <Jerry.Zuo@xxxxxxx>; Kazlauskas, Nicholas <Nicholas.Kazlauskas@xxxxxxx>; Dhinakaran > Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] drm/dp_mst: Set CLEAR_PAYLOAD_ID_TABLE as broadcast > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 12:00:27PM +0800, Wayne Lin wrote: > > [Why & How] > > According to DP spec, CLEAR_PAYLOAD_ID_TABLE is a path broadcast > > request message and current implementation is incorrect. Fix it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@xxxxxxx> > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 4 +++- > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c > > b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c > > index 713ef3b42054..6d73559046e5 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c > > @@ -1072,6 +1072,7 @@ static void build_clear_payload_id_table(struct > > drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx *msg) > > > > req.req_type = DP_CLEAR_PAYLOAD_ID_TABLE; > > drm_dp_encode_sideband_req(&req, msg); > > +msg->path_msg = true; > > } > > > > static int build_enum_path_resources(struct drm_dp_sideband_msg_tx > > *msg, @@ -2722,7 +2723,8 @@ static int set_hdr_from_dst_qlock(struct > > drm_dp_sideband_msg_hdr *hdr, > > > > req_type = txmsg->msg[0] & 0x7f; > > if (req_type == DP_CONNECTION_STATUS_NOTIFY || > > -req_type == DP_RESOURCE_STATUS_NOTIFY) > > +req_type == DP_RESOURCE_STATUS_NOTIFY || > > +req_type == DP_CLEAR_PAYLOAD_ID_TABLE) > > hdr->broadcast = 1; > > Looks correct. > Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Hmm. Looks like we're missing DP_POWER_DOWN_PHY and DP_POWER_UP_PHY here as well. We do try to send them as path > requests, but apparently forget to mark them as broadcast messages. Hi Ville, I also look up the spec but DP_POWER_DOWN_PHY & DP_POWER_UP_PHY seems to be defined as path or node request only. Not broadcast message. Please correct me if I'm wrong here. Appreciate for your time! > > > else > > hdr->broadcast = 0; > > -- > > 2.17.1 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > dri-devel mailing list > > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flist > > s.freedesktop.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fdri-devel&data=04%7C01%7C > > Wayne.Lin%40amd.com%7C372bbed7b5354ca05f5608d8d753533a%7C3dd8961fe4884 > > e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637496100180287539%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb > > 3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D% > > 7C1000&sdata=2uhm9Nf31hfhf%2FbmwfqYW7b6ay9swWb8oS10Uc%2FVFRQ%3D&am > > p;reserved=0 > > -- > Ville Syrjälä > Intel Regards, Wayne Lin _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
