Re: Not 100% sure if I correctly fixed drm-tip

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 11 Feb 2021, Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I had a conflict this morning in the ttm pool while pushing an important 
> fix to drm-misc-fixes.
>
> I'm not 100% sure if I correctly fixed up drm-tip. How can this be 
> double checked? And how can it be fixed if the merge has gone bad?

I'm afraid there's a problem; bb52cb0dec8d ("drm/ttm: make the pool
shrinker lock a mutex") in upstream and drm-misc-fixes creates a silent
conflict with ba051901d10f ("drm/ttm: add a debugfs file for the global
page pools") in drm-misc-next, causing the latter to use
spin_lock/unlock on a mutex.

But while you hit a conflict, it does look like the conflict breaking
the build is silent, AFAICT the spinlock part does not conflict. So a
fixup patch in drm-rerere is probably needed until there are some
backmerges.


BR,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux