On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 12:13:53PM +1000, Sam McNally wrote: > From: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@xxxxxxxxx> > > For adapters behind an MST hub use the correct AUX channel. > > Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@xxxxxxxxx> > [sammc@xxxxxxxxxxxx: rebased, removing redundant changes] > Signed-off-by: Sam McNally <sammc@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > > (no changes since v1) > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c > index 15b6cc39a754..0d753201adbd 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c > @@ -2255,6 +2255,9 @@ drm_dp_mst_topology_unlink_port(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, > drm_dp_mst_topology_put_port(port); > } > > +static ssize_t > +drm_dp_mst_aux_transfer(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg); > + > static struct drm_dp_mst_port * > drm_dp_mst_add_port(struct drm_device *dev, > struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, > @@ -2271,9 +2274,13 @@ drm_dp_mst_add_port(struct drm_device *dev, > port->port_num = port_number; > port->mgr = mgr; > port->aux.name = "DPMST"; > + mutex_init(&port->aux.hw_mutex); > + mutex_init(&port->aux.cec.lock); > port->aux.dev = dev->dev; > port->aux.is_remote = true; > > + port->aux.transfer = drm_dp_mst_aux_transfer; > + This was supposed to be handled via higher levels checking for is_remote==true. > /* initialize the MST downstream port's AUX crc work queue */ > drm_dp_remote_aux_init(&port->aux); > > @@ -3503,6 +3510,35 @@ static int drm_dp_send_up_ack_reply(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr, > return 0; > } > > +static ssize_t > +drm_dp_mst_aux_transfer(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, struct drm_dp_aux_msg *msg) > +{ > + struct drm_dp_mst_port *port = > + container_of(aux, struct drm_dp_mst_port, aux); > + int ret; > + > + switch (msg->request & ~DP_AUX_I2C_MOT) { > + case DP_AUX_NATIVE_WRITE: > + case DP_AUX_I2C_WRITE: > + case DP_AUX_I2C_WRITE_STATUS_UPDATE: > + ret = drm_dp_send_dpcd_write(port->mgr, port, msg->address, > + msg->size, msg->buffer); That doesn't make sense to me. I2c writes and DPCD writes are definitely not the same thing. aux->transfer is a very low level thing. I don't think it's the correct level of abstraction for sideband. > + break; > + > + case DP_AUX_NATIVE_READ: > + case DP_AUX_I2C_READ: > + ret = drm_dp_send_dpcd_read(port->mgr, port, msg->address, > + msg->size, msg->buffer); > + break; > + > + default: > + ret = -EINVAL; > + break; > + } > + > + return ret; > +} > + > static int drm_dp_get_vc_payload_bw(u8 dp_link_bw, u8 dp_link_count) > { > if (dp_link_bw == 0 || dp_link_count == 0) > -- > 2.28.0.681.g6f77f65b4e-goog > > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel -- Ville Syrjälä Intel _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel