> -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx> > Sent: Monday, February 01, 2021 7:29 AM > To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> > Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>; Gal Pressman <galpress@xxxxxxxxxx>; Xiong, Jianxin <jianxin.xiong@xxxxxxxxx>; Yishai Hadas > <yishaih@xxxxxxxxxx>; linux-rdma <linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Edward Srouji <edwards@xxxxxxxxxx>; dri-devel <dri- > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>; Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>; Vetter, Daniel > <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-core v7 4/6] pyverbs: Add dma-buf based MR support > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 03:10:00PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 7:16 AM Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 05:31:16PM +0200, Gal Pressman wrote: > > > > On 25/01/2021 21:57, Jianxin Xiong wrote: > > > > > Define a new sub-class of 'MR' that uses dma-buf object for the > > > > > memory region. Define a new class 'DmaBuf' as a wrapper for > > > > > dma-buf allocation mechanism implemented in C. > > > > > > > > > > Update the cmake function for cython modules to allow building > > > > > modules with mixed cython and c source files. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jianxin Xiong <jianxin.xiong@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > buildlib/pyverbs_functions.cmake | 78 +++++++---- > > > > > pyverbs/CMakeLists.txt | 11 +- > > > > > pyverbs/dmabuf.pxd | 15 +++ > > > > > pyverbs/dmabuf.pyx | 73 ++++++++++ > > > > > pyverbs/dmabuf_alloc.c | 278 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > pyverbs/dmabuf_alloc.h | 19 +++ > > > > > pyverbs/libibverbs.pxd | 2 + > > > > > pyverbs/mr.pxd | 6 + > > > > > pyverbs/mr.pyx | 105 ++++++++++++++- > > > > > 9 files changed, 557 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) create > > > > > mode 100644 pyverbs/dmabuf.pxd create mode 100644 > > > > > pyverbs/dmabuf.pyx create mode 100644 pyverbs/dmabuf_alloc.c > > > > > create mode 100644 pyverbs/dmabuf_alloc.h > > > > > > <...> > > > > > > > > index 0000000..05eae75 > > > > > +++ b/pyverbs/dmabuf_alloc.c > > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,278 @@ > > > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 OR Linux-OpenIB > > > > > +/* > > > > > + * Copyright 2020 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. See > > > > > +COPYING file */ > > > > > + > > > > > +#include <stdio.h> > > > > > +#include <stdlib.h> > > > > > +#include <stdint.h> > > > > > +#include <unistd.h> > > > > > +#include <string.h> > > > > > +#include <errno.h> > > > > > +#include <drm/drm.h> > > > > > +#include <drm/i915_drm.h> > > > > > +#include <drm/amdgpu_drm.h> > > > > > +#include <drm/radeon_drm.h> > > > > > > > > I assume these should come from the kernel headers package, right? > > > > > > This is gross, all kernel headers should be placed in > > > kernel-headers/* and "update" script needs to be extended to take drm/* files too :(. > > > > drm kernel headers are in the libdrm package. You need that anyway for > > doing the ioctls (if you don't hand-roll the restarting yourself). > > > > Also our userspace has gone over to just outright copying the driver > > headers. Not the generic headers, but for the rendering side of gpus, > > which is the topic here, there's really not much generic stuff. > > > > > Jianxin, are you fixing it? > > > > So fix is either to depend upon libdrm for building, or have copies of > > the headers included in the package for the i915/amdgpu/radeon headers > > (drm/drm.h probably not so good idea). > > We should have a cmake test to not build the drm parts if it can't be built, and pyverbs should skip the tests. > Yes, I will add a test for that. Also, on SLES, the headers could be under /usr/include/libdrm instead of /usr/include/drm. The make test should check that and use proper path. _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
