On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 9:49 AM Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
- there's been a pile of cgroups proposal to manage gpus at the drm
subsystem level, some by Kenny, and frankly this at least looks a bit
like a quick hack to sidestep the consensus process for that.
No Daniel, this is quick *draft* to get a conversation going. Bpf was actually a path suggested by Tejun back in 2018 so I think you are mischaracterizing this quite a bit.
"2018-11-20 Kenny Ho:
To put the questions in more concrete terms, let say a user wants to
expose certain part of a gpu to a particular cgroup similar to the
way selective cpu cores are exposed to a cgroup via cpuset, how
should we go about enabling such functionality?
2018-11-20 Tejun Heo:
Do what the intel driver or bpf is doing? It's not difficult to hook
into cgroup for identification purposes."
To put the questions in more concrete terms, let say a user wants to
expose certain part of a gpu to a particular cgroup similar to the
way selective cpu cores are exposed to a cgroup via cpuset, how
should we go about enabling such functionality?
2018-11-20 Tejun Heo:
Do what the intel driver or bpf is doing? It's not difficult to hook
into cgroup for identification purposes."
Kenny
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
