On 1/28/21 10:24 AM, Kalesh Singh wrote:
> The dmabuf inode number allows userspace to uniquely identify the buffer
> and avoids a dependency on /proc/<pid>/fd/* when accounting per-process
> DMA buffer sizes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> index 9ad6397aaa97..d869099ede83 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma-buf/dma-buf.c
> @@ -414,6 +414,7 @@ static void dma_buf_show_fdinfo(struct seq_file *m, struct file *file)
> {
> struct dma_buf *dmabuf = file->private_data;
>
> + seq_printf(m, "dmabuf_inode_no:\t%lu\n", file_inode(file)->i_ino);
> seq_printf(m, "size:\t%zu\n", dmabuf->size);
> /* Don't count the temporary reference taken inside procfs seq_show */
> seq_printf(m, "count:\t%ld\n", file_count(dmabuf->file) - 1);
>
Hi,
The subject is a little confusing.
It seems to say that the dmabuf inode no is being added to /proc/<pid>/fdino,
but looking at the code, it is being added to /proc/dmabuf (or /proc/<pid>/dmabuf).
Please clarify.
and is the /proc file format documented anywhere?
thanks.
--
~Randy
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
