On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 09:32:20AM +0800, Carlis wrote:
> @@ -82,6 +111,29 @@ enum st7789v_command {
> */
> static int init_display(struct fbtft_par *par)
> {
> + int rc;
> + struct device *dev = par->info->device;
> +
> + par->gpio.te = devm_gpiod_get_index_optional(dev, "te", 0, GPIOD_IN);
> + if (par->gpio.te) {
> + init_completion(&spi_panel_te);
> + mutex_init(&te_mutex);
> + rc = devm_request_irq(dev,
> + gpiod_to_irq(par->gpio.te),
> + spi_panel_te_handler, IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING,
> + "TE_GPIO", par);
> + if (rc) {
> + pr_err("TE request_irq failed.\n");
> + devm_gpiod_put(dev, par->gpio.te);
> + par->gpio.te = NULL;
> + } else {
> + disable_irq_nosync(gpiod_to_irq(par->gpio.te));
> + pr_info("TE request_irq completion.\n");
This printk adds no value.
Don't print anything on the success path. You should add that to your
code while your debugging the feature, but don't push it to the upstream
kernel.
> + }
> + } else {
> + pr_info("%s:%d, TE gpio not specified\n",
> + __func__, __LINE__);
> + }
regards,
dan carpenter
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
