On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 08:49:50AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > @@ -820,14 +796,25 @@ static int klp_init_object(struct klp_patch *patch, struct klp_object *obj) > const char *name; > > obj->patched = false; > - obj->mod = NULL; Why was this line removed? > if (klp_is_module(obj)) { > if (strlen(obj->name) >= MODULE_NAME_LEN) > return -EINVAL; > name = obj->name; > > - klp_find_object_module(obj); > + /* > + * We do not want to block removal of patched modules and > + * therefore we do not take a reference here. The patches are > + * removed by klp_module_going() instead. > + * > + * Do not mess work of klp_module_coming() and > + * klp_module_going(). Note that the patch might still be > + * needed before klp_module_going() is called. Module functions > + * can be called even in the GOING state until mod->exit() > + * finishes. This is especially important for patches that > + * modify semantic of the functions. > + */ > + obj->mod = find_klp_module(obj->name); These comments don't make sense in this context, they should be kept with the code in find_klp_module(). -- Josh _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel