On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 07:46:44AM +0800, Chun-Kuang Hu wrote:
> Hi, Matthias:
>
> Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@xxxxxxxxxx> 於 2021年1月21日 週四 上午2:27寫道：
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 07:17:27AM +0800, Chun-Kuang Hu wrote:
> > > From: CK Hu <ck.hu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > mtk mutex is used by both drm and mdp driver, so change disp/ddp term to
> > > mutex to show that it's a common driver for drm and mdp.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <chunkuang.hu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_crtc.c | 30 +--
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c | 2 +-
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.h | 2 +-
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.c | 305 ++++++++++++------------
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.h | 26 +-
> > > 5 files changed, 182 insertions(+), 183 deletions(-)
> > >
> > [...]
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.c
> > > index 1c8a253f4788..98a060bf225d 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_mutex.c
> > [...]
> > >
> > > -static const struct of_device_id ddp_driver_dt_match[] = {
> > > +static const struct of_device_id mutex_driver_dt_match[] = {
> > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2701-disp-mutex",
> > > - .data = &mt2701_ddp_driver_data},
> > > + .data = &mt2701_mutex_driver_data},
> > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt2712-disp-mutex",
> > > - .data = &mt2712_ddp_driver_data},
> > > + .data = &mt2712_mutex_driver_data},
> > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8167-disp-mutex",
> > > - .data = &mt8167_ddp_driver_data},
> > > + .data = &mt8167_mutex_driver_data},
> > > { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8173-disp-mutex",
> > > - .data = &mt8173_ddp_driver_data},
> > > + .data = &mt8173_mutex_driver_data},
> > > {},
> > > };
> > > -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ddp_driver_dt_match);
> > > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mutex_driver_dt_match);
> >
> > I think it would make sense in a follow-up patch to update the binding
> > to use "mediatek,mt2701-mutex" to reflect that mutex is used for drm and
> > mdp driver. Make sense?
>
> Yes, it make sense. I would try to update the binding, but I wonder
> device tree should be backward compatible? Let's discuss in that
> follow-up patches.
>
>From my understanding, we will need to keep the of_device_id entries for
the old binding in the driver (so that old DTs still work) while we
should enforce the new binding. I'm not sure if the yaml has a option
for out-of-date compatibles.
Regards,
Matthias
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
