On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 02:04:48PM -0500, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 1:26 PM Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 11:36:01AM -0500, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote:
> > >
> > > On 1/19/21 2:34 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 04:01:19PM -0500, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote:
> > > > > static struct pci_driver amdgpu_kms_pci_driver = {
> > > > > .name = DRIVER_NAME,
> > > > > .id_table = pciidlist,
> > > > > @@ -1595,6 +1607,7 @@ static struct pci_driver amdgpu_kms_pci_driver = {
> > > > > .shutdown = amdgpu_pci_shutdown,
> > > > > .driver.pm = &amdgpu_pm_ops,
> > > > > .err_handler = &amdgpu_pci_err_handler,
> > > > > + .driver.dev_groups = amdgpu_sysfs_groups,
> > > > Shouldn't this just be:
> > > > groups - amdgpu_sysfs_groups,
> > > >
> > > > Why go to the "driver root" here?
> > >
> > >
> > > Because I still didn't get to your suggestion to propose a patch to add groups to
> > > pci_driver, it's located in 'base' driver struct.
> >
> > You are a pci driver, you should never have to mess with the "base"
> > driver struct. Look at commit 92d50fc1602e ("PCI/IB: add support for
> > pci driver attribute groups") which got merged in 4.14, way back in
> > 2017 :)
>
> Per the previous discussion of this patch set:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg56019.html
Hey, at least I'm consistent :)
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
