The comment says the layout and options use 8 bits, and the shift uses 8 bits. However the mask is 0xf, ie. 0b00001111 (4 bits). This could be surprising when introducing new layouts or options that take more than 4 bits, as this would silently drop the high bits. Make the masks consistent with the comment and the shift. Found when writing a drm_info patch [1]. [1]: https://github.com/ascent12/drm_info/pull/67 Signed-off-by: Simon Ser <contact@xxxxxxxxxxx> Fixes: d6528ec88309 ("drm/fourcc: Add modifier definitions for describing Amlogic Video Framebuffer Compression") Cc: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> --- include/uapi/drm/drm_fourcc.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/drm_fourcc.h b/include/uapi/drm/drm_fourcc.h index 723c8e23ca87..5f42a14481bd 100644 --- a/include/uapi/drm/drm_fourcc.h +++ b/include/uapi/drm/drm_fourcc.h @@ -1036,9 +1036,9 @@ drm_fourcc_canonicalize_nvidia_format_mod(__u64 modifier) * Not all combinations are valid, and different SoCs may support different * combinations of layout and options. */ -#define __fourcc_mod_amlogic_layout_mask 0xf +#define __fourcc_mod_amlogic_layout_mask 0xff #define __fourcc_mod_amlogic_options_shift 8 -#define __fourcc_mod_amlogic_options_mask 0xf +#define __fourcc_mod_amlogic_options_mask 0xff #define DRM_FORMAT_MOD_AMLOGIC_FBC(__layout, __options) \ fourcc_mod_code(AMLOGIC, \ -- 2.30.0 _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
