On Wed, Dec 30, 2020 at 4:56 PM Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Quoting Arnd Bergmann (2020-12-30 15:39:14)
> > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Randconfig builds on 32-bit machines show lots of warnings for
> > the i915 driver for incorrect bit masks like:
>
> mask is a u8.
>
> VCS0 is 2, I915_MAX_VCS 4
>
> (u8 & GENMASK(5, 2)) >> 2
Ah right, I misread the warning then.
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_execbuffer.c:2584:9: error: shift count >= width of type [-Werror,-Wshift-count-overflow]
> > return hweight64(VDBOX_MASK(&i915->gt));
> > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > include/asm-generic/bitops/const_hweight.h:29:49: note: expanded from macro 'hweight64'
> > #define hweight64(w) (__builtin_constant_p(w) ? __const_hweight64(w) : __arch_hweight64(w))
>
> So it's upset by hweight64() on the unsigned long?
I suspect what is going on is that clang once again warns because it performs
more code checks before dead-code elimination than gcc does. The warning is
for the __const_hweight64() case, which is not actually used here because the
input is not a compile-time constant.
> So hweight_long?
That seems to work, I'll send a new version with that.
> Or use a cast, hweight8((intel_engine_mask_t)VDMASK())?
>
> static __always_inline int engine_count(intel_engine_mask_t mask)
> {
> return sizeof(mask) == 1 ? hweight8(mask) :
> sizeof(mask) == 2 ? hweight16(mask) :
> sizeof(mask) == 4 ? hweight32(mask) :
> hweight64(mask);
> }
Fine with me as well. If you prefer that way, I'll let you handle that.
Arnd
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
