Re: [PATCH] drm/[amdgpu|radeon]: fix memset on io mem

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 21:45:06 +0800,
Robin Murphy wrote:
> 
> On 2020-12-17 10:25, Christian König wrote:
> > Am 17.12.20 um 02:07 schrieb Chen Li:
> >> On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 22:19:11 +0800,
> >> Christian König wrote:
> >>> Am 16.12.20 um 14:48 schrieb Chen Li:
> >>>> On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 15:59:37 +0800,
> >>>> Christian König wrote:
> >>>>> [SNIP]
> >>>> Hi, Christian. I'm not sure why this change is a hack here. I cannot see
> >>>> the problem and wll be grateful if you give more explainations.
> >>> __memset is supposed to work on those addresses, otherwise you can't use the
> >>> e8860 on your arm64 system.
> >> If __memset is supposed to work on those adresses, why this
> >> commit(https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Ftorvalds%2Flinux%2Fcommit%2Fba0b2275a6781b2f3919d931d63329b5548f6d5f&data=04%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7C4ed3c075888746b7f41408d8a22811c5%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637437640274023350%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=HhWxUaLo3WpzoV6hjV%2BG1HICaIOXwsoNpzv5tNMNg8A%3D&reserved=0)
> >> is needed? (I also notice drm/radeon didn't take this change though) just out
> >> of curiosity.
> > 
> > We generally accept those patches as cleanup in the kernel with the hope that
> > we can find a way to work around the userspace restrictions.
> > 
> > But when you also have this issue in userspace then there isn't much we can do
> > for you.
> > 
> >>> Replacing the the direct write in the kernel with calls to writel() or
> >>> memset_io() will fix that temporary, but you have a more general problem
> >>> here.
> >> I cannot see what's the more general problem here :( u mean performance?
> > 
> > No, not performance. See standards like OpenGL, Vulkan as well as VA-API and
> > VDPAU require that you can mmap() device memory and execute memset/memcpy on
> > the memory from userspace.
> > 
> > If your ARM base board can't do that for some then you can't use the hardware
> > with that board.
> 
> If the VRAM lives in a prefetchable PCI bar then on most sane Arm-based systems
> I believe it should be able to mmap() to userspace with the Normal memory type,
> where unaligned accesses and such are allowed, as opposed to the Device memory
> type intended for MMIO mappings, which has more restrictions but stricter
> ordering guarantees.
 
Hi, Robin. I cannot understand it allow unaligned accesses. prefetchable PCI bar should also be mmio, and accesses will end with device memory, so why does this allow unaligned access?
> Regardless of what happens elsewhere though, if something is mapped *into the
> kernel* with ioremap(), then it is fundamentally wrong per the kernel memory
> model to reference that mapping directly without using I/O accessors. That is
> not specific to any individual architecture, and Sparse should be screaming
> about it already. I guess in this case the UVD code needs to pay more attention
> to whether radeon_bo_kmap() ends up going via ttm_bo_ioremap() or not.
> 
> (I'm assuming the initial fault was memset() with 0 trying to perform "DC ZVA"
> on a Device-type mapping from ioremap() - FYI a stacktrace on its own without
> the rest of the error dump showing what actually triggered it isn't overly
> useful)
> 
> Robin.
why it may be 'DC ZVA'? I'm not sure the pc in initial kernel fault memset, but I capture the userspace crash pc: stp(128bit) or str with neon(also 128bit) to render node(/dev/dri/renderD128).
 
> >>>>> For amdgpu I suggest that we allocate the UVD message in GTT instead of
> >>>>> VRAM
> >>>>> since we don't have the hardware restriction for that on the new
> >>>>> generations.
> >>>>> 
> >>>> Thanks, I will try to dig into deeper. But what's the "hardware
> >>>> restriction" meaning here? I'm not familiar with video driver stack and amd
> >>>> gpu, sorry.
> >>> On older hardware (AGP days) the buffer had to be in VRAM (MMIO) memory, but
> >>> on
> >>> modern system GTT (system memory) works as well.
> >> IIUC, e8860 can use amdgpu(I use radeon now) beause its device id 6822 is in
> >> amdgpu's table. But I cannot tell whether e8860 has iommu, and I cannot find
> >> iommu from lspci, so graphics translation table may not work here?
> > 
> > That is not related to IOMMU. IOMMU is a feature of the CPU/motherboard. This
> > is implemented using GTT, e.g. the VM page tables inside the GPU.
> > 
> > And yes it should work I will prepare a patch for it.
> > 
> >>>>> BTW: How does userspace work on arm64 then? The driver stack usually only
> >>>>> works
> >>>>> if mmio can be mapped directly.
> >>>> I also post two usespace issue on mesa, and you may be interested with
> >>>> them:
> >>>>    https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitlab.freedesktop.org%2Fmesa%2Fmesa%2F-%2Fissues%2F3954&data=04%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7C4ed3c075888746b7f41408d8a22811c5%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637437640274023350%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=ZR7pDS%2BCLUuMjCeKcMAXfHtbczt8WdUwSeLZCuHfCHw%3D&reserved=0 
> >>>>    https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgitlab.freedesktop.org%2Fmesa%2Fmesa%2F-%2Fissues%2F3951&data=04%7C01%7Cchristian.koenig%40amd.com%7C4ed3c075888746b7f41408d8a22811c5%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637437640274033344%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=jAJo3aG2I1oIDTZXWhNgcKoKbd6tTdiAtc7vE4hJJPY%3D&reserved=0 
> >>>> I paste some virtual memory map in userspace there. (and the two problems
> >>>> do bother me quite a long time.)
> >>> I don't really see a solution for those problems.
> >>> 
> >>> See it is perfectly valid for an application to memset/memcpy on mmaped MMIO
> >>> space which comes from OpenGL or Vulkan.
> >>> 
> >>> So your CPU simply won't work with the hardware. We could work around that
> >>> with
> >>> a couple of hacks, but this is a pretty much general problem.
> >>> 
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Christian.
> >> Thanks! Can you provid some details about these hacks? Should I post another
> >> issue on the mail list?
> > 
> > Adjust the kernel and/or user space to never map VRAM to the CPU.
> > 
> > This violates the OpenGL/Vulkan specification in some ways. So not sure if
> > that will work or not.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Christian.
> > _______________________________________________
> > dri-devel mailing list
> > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
> 
> 


_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux