Hi Randy, > >> > >> Yes, RETURNS: will work. It just looks like any kernel-doc section name, > >> such as Context: or Note:. > >> However, the documented format for return info is "Return:". > >> (see Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst) > > > > Thanks for the note. I asked for RETURNS: because the rest of the file appears to be using it. Returns: is certainly the better alternative. I didn't know there was a difference. > > > > Best regards > > Thomas > > > > I'm not insisting on using Return: > It can stay the same as the rest of the file IMO. fb_notify.c contains only the three functions modified in this patch. So it is consistent within this file, but other fbdev/core/ files uses RETURNS. git grep shows 5 hits only. So we will stick with the documented practice here. Sam _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
