On 30/11/2020 12:00, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Tomi, > > Thank you for the patch. > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 02:45:20PM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: >> The VC handling has gotten quite tangled up. As the first step to clean >> it up, lets define that we only support a single DSI peripheral (which >> was really already the case), and we always use VC0 (define VC_DEFAULT >> 0) register block to send data to the peripheral. >> >> We can thus have a single mipi_dsi_device pointer and remove the for > > s/the for/the need for/ ? Hmm, no, that's not what I was trying to say. Maybe it's clearer with a dash: "remove the for-loops which..." > >> loops which made passes over all the four VCs (just the first one was >> ever used). >> >> Signed-off-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
