Hi Tomi, On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 11:46:31AM +0200, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On 30/11/2020 11:36, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 09:31:29PM +0530, Nikhil Devshatwar wrote: > >> bus_flags can be specified by a bridge in the timings. > >> If the bridge provides it, Override the bus_flags when propagating > >> from next bridge. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Nikhil Devshatwar <nikhil.nd@xxxxxx> > >> Reviewed-by: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@xxxxxx> > >> --- > >> > >> Notes: > >> changes from v2: > >> * update comment > >> changes from v1: > >> * Check for timings > >> * Prioritize timings flags over next bridge's flags > >> > >> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c | 8 ++++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c > >> index 64f0effb52ac..13b67fc0dad3 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c > >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_bridge.c > >> @@ -975,6 +975,14 @@ drm_atomic_bridge_propagate_bus_flags(struct drm_bridge *bridge, > >> * duplicate the "dummy propagation" logic. > >> */ > >> bridge_state->input_bus_cfg.flags = output_flags; > >> + > >> + /* > >> + * If legacy bus flags are provided in bridge->timings, use those as > >> + * input flags instead of propagating the output flags. > >> + */ > >> + if (bridge->timings && bridge->timings->input_bus_flags) > >> + bridge_state->input_bus_cfg.flags = > >> + bridge->timings->input_bus_flags; > > > > Hasn't Boris commented in his review of v1 that bus flags should be set > > in atomic_check, even when they're static ? We're moving towards > > removing timings->input_bus_flags, so this patch goes in the wrong > > direction :-S > > We have atomic_check only if the bridge has implemented atomic funcs. And even if there's > atomic_check, not all bridges set the bus_flags there. So we need to either 1) fix the issue for now > as in this patch, or 2) convert all bridges to use atomic funcs and fix all the bridges to set the > bus_flags. The second option is what we'd like to achieve. Wouldn't it be best to already start going in that direction ? We don't need to convert all bridge drivers in one go here, just the ones that are used by tidss. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel