Am 25.11.20 um 04:17 schrieb Luben Tuikov:
Introduce a macro DRM_THREAD_NAME_LEN
and use that to define ring name size,
instead of hardcoding it to 16.
Signed-off-by: Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.h | 2 +-
include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.h
index 7112137689db..bbd46c6dec65 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ring.h
@@ -230,7 +230,7 @@ struct amdgpu_ring {
unsigned wptr_offs;
unsigned fence_offs;
uint64_t current_ctx;
- char name[16];
+ char name[DRM_THREAD_NAME_LEN];
u32 trail_seq;
unsigned trail_fence_offs;
u64 trail_fence_gpu_addr;
diff --git a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
index 61f7121e1c19..3a5686c3b5e9 100644
--- a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
+++ b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
@@ -30,6 +30,8 @@
#define MAX_WAIT_SCHED_ENTITY_Q_EMPTY msecs_to_jiffies(1000)
+#define DRM_THREAD_NAME_LEN TASK_COMM_LEN
+
The thread name is an amdgpu specific thing. I don't think we should
have that in the scheduler.
And why do you use TASK_COMM_LEN here? That is completely unrelated stuff.
Regards,
Christian.
struct drm_gpu_scheduler;
struct drm_sched_rq;
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
