On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 06:24:43PM +0000, Xiong, Jianxin wrote: > > From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Tuesday, November 24, 2020 1:34 AM > > To: Xiong, Jianxin <jianxin.xiong@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: linux-rdma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>; Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx>; > > Leon Romanovsky <leon@xxxxxxxxxx>; Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@xxxxxxxxxx>; Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>; Vetter, > > Daniel <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 1/4] RDMA/umem: Support importing dma-buf as user memory region > > > > As these are mostly trivial wrappers around the EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL dmabuf exports please stick to that export style. > > > > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/umem_dmabuf.h > > > @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ > > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-3-Clause) */ > > > +/* > > > + * Copyright (c) 2020 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. > > > + */ > > > + > > > +#ifndef UMEM_DMABUF_H > > > +#define UMEM_DMABUF_H > > > + > > > +void ib_umem_dmabuf_release(struct ib_umem_dmabuf *umem_dmabuf); > > > + > > > +#endif /* UMEM_DMABUF_H */ > > > > Does this really need a separate header? > > The symbol doesn't need to be exported otherwise it can be put into "ib_umem.h". > Although the prototype could be put into the file where it is called directly, using a > separate header file provides a cleaner interface. It is fine to put this single symbol in ib_umem.h Thanks Jason _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
