Re: [PATCH v6 16/17] RFC: kvm: pass kvm argument to follow_pfn callsites

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 19/11/20 15:41, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Both Christoph Hellwig and Jason Gunthorpe suggested that usage of
follow_pfn by modules should be locked down more. To do so callers
need to be able to pass the mmu_notifier subscription corresponding
to the mm_struct to follow_pfn().

This patch does the rote work of doing that in the kvm subsystem. In
most places this is solved by passing struct kvm * down the call
stacks as an additional parameter, since that contains the
mmu_notifier.

Compile tested on all affected arch.

It's a bit of a pity, it's making an API more complex (the point of gfn_to_pfn_memslot vs gfn_to_pfn is exactly that you don't need a "struct kvm*" and it's clear that you've already done the lookup into that struct kvm.

But it's not a big deal, and the rationale at least makes sense.  So,

Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>

Paolo
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux