Am 18.11.20 um 08:39 schrieb Daniel Vetter:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 9:07 PM Andrey Grodzovsky
<Andrey.Grodzovsky@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On 11/17/20 2:49 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 02:18:49PM -0500, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote:
On 11/17/20 1:52 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 01:38:14PM -0500, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote:
On 6/22/20 5:53 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 02:03:08AM -0400, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote:
No point to try recovery if device is gone, just messes up things.
Signed-off-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@xxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_job.c | 8 ++++++++
2 files changed, 24 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
index 6932d75..5d6d3d9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_drv.c
@@ -1129,12 +1129,28 @@ static int amdgpu_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
return ret;
}
+static void amdgpu_cancel_all_tdr(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < AMDGPU_MAX_RINGS; ++i) {
+ struct amdgpu_ring *ring = adev->rings[i];
+
+ if (!ring || !ring->sched.thread)
+ continue;
+
+ cancel_delayed_work_sync(&ring->sched.work_tdr);
+ }
+}
I think this is a function that's supposed to be in drm/scheduler, not
here. Might also just be your cleanup code being ordered wrongly, or your
split in one of the earlier patches not done quite right.
-Daniel
This function iterates across all the schedulers per amdgpu device and accesses
amdgpu specific structures , drm/scheduler deals with single scheduler at most
so looks to me like this is the right place for this function
I guess we could keep track of all schedulers somewhere in a list in
struct drm_device and wrap this up. That was kinda the idea.
Minimally I think a tiny wrapper with docs for the
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&sched->work_tdr); which explains what you must
observe to make sure there's no race.
Will do
I'm not exactly sure there's no
guarantee here we won't get a new tdr work launched right afterwards at
least, so this looks a bit like a hack.
Note that for any TDR work happening post amdgpu_cancel_all_tdr
amdgpu_job_timedout->drm_dev_is_unplugged
will return true and so it will return early. To make it water proof tight
against race
i can switch from drm_dev_is_unplugged to drm_dev_enter/exit
Hm that's confusing. You do a work_cancel_sync, so that at least looks
like "tdr work must not run after this point"
If you only rely on drm_dev_enter/exit check with the tdr work, then
there's no need to cancel anything.
Agree, synchronize_srcu from drm_dev_unplug should play the role
of 'flushing' any earlier (in progress) tdr work which is
using drm_dev_enter/exit pair. Any later arising tdr will terminate early when
drm_dev_enter
returns false.
Nope, anything you put into the work itself cannot close this race.
It's the schedule_work that matters here. Or I'm missing something ...
I thought that the tdr work you're cancelling here is launched by
drm/scheduler code, not by the amd callback?
Yes that is correct. Canceling the work item is not the right approach
at all, nor is adding dev_enter/exit pair in the recovery handler.
What we need to do here is to stop the scheduler thread and then wait
for any timeout handling to have finished.
Otherwise it can scheduler a new timeout just after we have canceled
this one.
Regards,
Christian.
-Daniel
Will update.
Andrey
For race free cancel_work_sync you need:
1. make sure whatever is calling schedule_work is guaranteed to no longer
call schedule_work.
2. call cancel_work_sync
Anything else is cargo-culted work cleanup:
- 1. without 2. means if a work got scheduled right before it'll still be
a problem.
- 2. without 1. means a schedule_work right after makes you calling
cancel_work_sync pointless.
So either both or nothing.
-Daniel
Andrey
-Daniel
Andrey
+
static void
amdgpu_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
{
struct drm_device *dev = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
+ struct amdgpu_device *adev = dev->dev_private;
drm_dev_unplug(dev);
+ amdgpu_cancel_all_tdr(adev);
ttm_bo_unmap_virtual_address_space(&adev->mman.bdev);
amdgpu_driver_unload_kms(dev);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_job.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_job.c
index 4720718..87ff0c0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_job.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_job.c
@@ -28,6 +28,8 @@
#include "amdgpu.h"
#include "amdgpu_trace.h"
+#include <drm/drm_drv.h>
+
static void amdgpu_job_timedout(struct drm_sched_job *s_job)
{
struct amdgpu_ring *ring = to_amdgpu_ring(s_job->sched);
@@ -37,6 +39,12 @@ static void amdgpu_job_timedout(struct drm_sched_job *s_job)
memset(&ti, 0, sizeof(struct amdgpu_task_info));
+ if (drm_dev_is_unplugged(adev->ddev)) {
+ DRM_INFO("ring %s timeout, but device unplugged, skipping.\n",
+ s_job->sched->name);
+ return;
+ }
+
if (amdgpu_ring_soft_recovery(ring, job->vmid, s_job->s_fence->parent)) {
DRM_ERROR("ring %s timeout, but soft recovered\n",
s_job->sched->name);
--
2.7.4
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
