Looks good for me, patch is:
Reviewed-by: Qiang Yu <yuq825@xxxxxxxxx>
Regards,
Qiang
On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 3:05 PM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The dev_pm_opp_put_*() APIs now accepts a NULL opp_table pointer and so
> there is no need for us to carry the extra check. Drop them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c | 13 ++++---------
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c
> index bbe02817721b..e7b7b8dfd792 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c
> @@ -110,15 +110,10 @@ void lima_devfreq_fini(struct lima_device *ldev)
> devfreq->opp_of_table_added = false;
> }
>
> - if (devfreq->regulators_opp_table) {
> - dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(devfreq->regulators_opp_table);
> - devfreq->regulators_opp_table = NULL;
> - }
> -
> - if (devfreq->clkname_opp_table) {
> - dev_pm_opp_put_clkname(devfreq->clkname_opp_table);
> - devfreq->clkname_opp_table = NULL;
> - }
> + dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(devfreq->regulators_opp_table);
> + dev_pm_opp_put_clkname(devfreq->clkname_opp_table);
> + devfreq->regulators_opp_table = NULL;
> + devfreq->clkname_opp_table = NULL;
> }
>
> int lima_devfreq_init(struct lima_device *ldev)
> --
> 2.25.0.rc1.19.g042ed3e048af
>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
