Re: [PATCH v10 6/6] dma-buf: Document that dma-buf size is fixed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 11, 2020 at 05:33:23PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2020 at 01:41:17PM -0800, Jianxin Xiong wrote:
> > The fact that the size of dma-buf is invariant over the lifetime of the
> > buffer is mentioned in the comment of 'dma_buf_ops.mmap', but is not
> > documented at where the info is defined. Add the missing documentation.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jianxin Xiong <jianxin.xiong@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Applied to drm-misc-next, thanks for your patch. For the preceeding
> dma-buf patch I'll wait for more review/acks before I apply it. Ack from
> Jason might also be good, since looks like this dma_virt_ops is only used
> in rdma.

We are likely to delete it entirely this cycle, Christoph already has
a patch series to do it:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rdma/list/?series=379277

So, lets just forget about it

Jason
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux