Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] drm/ttm: Remap all page faults to per process dummy page.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 6/22/20 5:41 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 02:03:02AM -0400, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote:
On device removal reroute all CPU mappings to dummy page per drm_file
instance or imported GEM object.

Signed-off-by: Andrey Grodzovsky <andrey.grodzovsky@xxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
  1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c
index 389128b..2f8bf5e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c
@@ -35,6 +35,8 @@
  #include <drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h>
  #include <drm/ttm/ttm_placement.h>
  #include <drm/drm_vma_manager.h>
+#include <drm/drm_drv.h>
+#include <drm/drm_file.h>
  #include <linux/mm.h>
  #include <linux/pfn_t.h>
  #include <linux/rbtree.h>
@@ -328,19 +330,66 @@ vm_fault_t ttm_bo_vm_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
Hm I think diff and code flow look a bit bad now. What about renaming the
current function to __ttm_bo_vm_fault and then having something like the
below:

ttm_bo_vm_fault(args) {

	if (drm_dev_enter()) {
		__ttm_bo_vm_fault(args);
		drm_dev_exit();
	} else  {
		drm_gem_insert_dummy_pfn();
	}
}

I think drm_gem_insert_dummy_pfn(); should be portable across drivers, so
another nice point to try to unifiy drivers as much as possible.
-Daniel

  	pgprot_t prot;
  	struct ttm_buffer_object *bo = vma->vm_private_data;
  	vm_fault_t ret;
+	int idx;
+	struct drm_device *ddev = bo->base.dev;
- ret = ttm_bo_vm_reserve(bo, vmf);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
+	if (drm_dev_enter(ddev, &idx)) {
+		ret = ttm_bo_vm_reserve(bo, vmf);
+		if (ret)
+			goto exit;
+
+		prot = vma->vm_page_prot;
- prot = vma->vm_page_prot;
-	ret = ttm_bo_vm_fault_reserved(vmf, prot, TTM_BO_VM_NUM_PREFAULT);
-	if (ret == VM_FAULT_RETRY && !(vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_RETRY_NOWAIT))
+		ret = ttm_bo_vm_fault_reserved(vmf, prot, TTM_BO_VM_NUM_PREFAULT);
+		if (ret == VM_FAULT_RETRY && !(vmf->flags & FAULT_FLAG_RETRY_NOWAIT))
+			goto exit;
+
+		dma_resv_unlock(bo->base.resv);
+
+exit:
+		drm_dev_exit(idx);
  		return ret;
+	} else {
- dma_resv_unlock(bo->base.resv);
+		struct drm_file *file = NULL;
+		struct page *dummy_page = NULL;
+		int handle;
- return ret;
+		/* We are faulting on imported BO from dma_buf */
+		if (bo->base.dma_buf && bo->base.import_attach) {
+			dummy_page = bo->base.dummy_page;
+		/* We are faulting on non imported BO, find drm_file owning the BO*/
Uh, we can't fish that out of the vma->vm_file pointer somehow? Or is that
one all wrong? Doing this kind of list walk looks pretty horrible.

If the vma doesn't have the right pointer I guess next option is that we
store the drm_file page in gem_bo->dummy_page, and replace it on first
export. But that's going to be tricky to track ...


For this one I hope to make all of this obsolete if Christian's suggestion from path 1/8 about mapping global RO dummy page for read and COW on write will be possible to implement (testing
that indeed no memory usage explodes)

Andrey



+		} else {
+			struct drm_gem_object *gobj;
+
+			mutex_lock(&ddev->filelist_mutex);
+			list_for_each_entry(file, &ddev->filelist, lhead) {
+				spin_lock(&file->table_lock);
+				idr_for_each_entry(&file->object_idr, gobj, handle) {
+					if (gobj == &bo->base) {
+						dummy_page = file->dummy_page;
+						break;
+					}
+				}
+				spin_unlock(&file->table_lock);
+			}
+			mutex_unlock(&ddev->filelist_mutex);
+		}
+
+		if (dummy_page) {
+			/*
+			 * Let do_fault complete the PTE install e.t.c using vmf->page
+			 *
+			 * TODO - should i call free_page somewhere ?
Nah, instead don't call get_page. The page will be around as long as
there's a reference for the drm_file or gem_bo, which is longer than any
mmap. Otherwise yes this would like really badly.

+			 */
+			get_page(dummy_page);
+			vmf->page = dummy_page;
+			return 0;
+		} else {
+			return VM_FAULT_SIGSEGV;
Hm that would be a kernel bug, wouldn't it? WARN_ON() required here imo.
-Daniel

+		}
+	}
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL(ttm_bo_vm_fault);
--
2.7.4

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux