On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 5:15 PM Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Noticed this when trying to compile with -Wall on a kernel fork. We potentially
> don't set width here, which causes the compiler to complain about width
> potentially being uninitialized in drm_cvt_modes(). So, let's fix that.
>
> Changes since v1:
> * Don't emit an error as this code isn't reachable, just mark it as such
>
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v5.9+
> Fixes: 3f649ab728cd ("treewide: Remove uninitialized_var() usage")
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> index 631125b46e04..0643b98c6383 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> @@ -3094,6 +3094,7 @@ static int drm_cvt_modes(struct drm_connector *connector,
>
> for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
> int width, height;
> + u8 cvt_aspect_ratio;
>
> cvt = &(timing->data.other_data.data.cvt[i]);
>
> @@ -3101,7 +3102,8 @@ static int drm_cvt_modes(struct drm_connector *connector,
> continue;
>
> height = (cvt->code[0] + ((cvt->code[1] & 0xf0) << 4) + 1) * 2;
> - switch (cvt->code[1] & 0x0c) {
> + cvt_aspect_ratio = cvt->code[1] & 0x0c;
The temp var doesn't do anything now right? Previously you were using
it in the print, but now you can drop these two hunks, I think?
-ilia
> + switch (cvt_aspect_ratio) {
> case 0x00:
> width = height * 4 / 3;
> break;
> @@ -3114,6 +3116,8 @@ static int drm_cvt_modes(struct drm_connector *connector,
> case 0x0c:
> width = height * 15 / 9;
> break;
> + default:
> + unreachable();
> }
>
> for (j = 1; j < 5; j++) {
> --
> 2.28.0
>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
