Hi, On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 6:17 PM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > We should be setting the drm_dp_aux_msg::reply field if a NACK or a > SHORT reply happens. Update the error bit handling logic in > ti_sn_aux_transfer() to handle these cases and notify upper layers that > such errors have happened. This helps the retry logic understand that a > timeout has happened, or to shorten the read length if the panel isn't > able to handle the longest read possible. > > Note: I don't have any hardware that exhibits these code paths so this > is written based on reading the datasheet for this bridge and inspecting > the code and how this is called. > > Changes in v2: > - Handle WRITE_STATUS_UPDATE properly > > Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Jonas Karlman <jonas@xxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@xxxxxxxx> > Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) This looks right to me, now. Hopefully if/when someone ends up with hardware that exercises these codepaths they'll at least be in a better state and maybe they will all just work! :-) Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
