There's no reason we need to wait here to poll a register over i2c. The i2c bus is inherently slow and delays are practically part of the protocol because we have to wait for the device to respond to any request for a register. Let's rely on the sleeping of the i2c controller instead of adding any sort of delay here in the bridge driver. Reviewed-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Jonas Karlman <jonas@xxxxxxxxx> Cc: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@xxxxxxxx> Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c index a1ebfa95088c..c77f46a21aae 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c @@ -881,9 +881,9 @@ static ssize_t ti_sn_aux_transfer(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, regmap_write(pdata->regmap, SN_AUX_CMD_REG, request_val | AUX_CMD_SEND); + /* Zero delay loop because i2c transactions are slow already */ ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(pdata->regmap, SN_AUX_CMD_REG, val, - !(val & AUX_CMD_SEND), 200, - 50 * 1000); + !(val & AUX_CMD_SEND), 0, 50 * 1000); if (ret) return ret; -- Sent by a computer, using git, on the internet _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
