Hi Lyude,
Em Tue, 13 Oct 2020 15:49:11 -0400
Lyude Paul <lyude@xxxxxxxxxx> escreveu:
> wait, I think there's some confusion here. these patches have already been
> pushed
As the patch adding the warning was merged upstream at the 5.10 merge
window, the fixup one should also be added there, instead of waiting
until 5.11 ;-)
So, if OK for you, I'll send this upstream via my tree by the end of
the merge window, as our goal is that 5.10 won't have doc warnings.
Regards,
Mauro
>
>
> On Tue, 2020-10-13 at 14:14 +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > The name of the argument is different, causing those warnings:
> >
> > ./drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c:3754: warning: Function parameter or member
> > 'video_code' not described in 'drm_display_mode_from_cea_vic'
> > ./drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c:3754: warning: Excess function parameter
> > 'vic' description in 'drm_display_mode_from_cea_vic'
> >
> > Fixes: 7af655bce275 ("drm/dp: Add drm_dp_downstream_mode()")
> > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> > index a82f37d44258..631125b46e04 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> > @@ -3741,7 +3741,7 @@ drm_add_cmdb_modes(struct drm_connector *connector, u8
> > svd)
> > /**
> > * drm_display_mode_from_cea_vic() - return a mode for CEA VIC
> > * @dev: DRM device
> > - * @vic: CEA VIC of the mode
> > + * @video_code: CEA VIC of the mode
> > *
> > * Creates a new mode matching the specified CEA VIC.
> > *
Thanks,
Mauro
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
