Hi Daniel,
On 2020/10/15 下午11:23, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 09:48:43AM +0800, Kever Yang wrote:
Hi Maintainers,
Does this patch ready to merge?
Would maybe be good to get some acks from other drivers using this, then
Sandy can push to drm-misc-next.
Thanks for your reply, I can understand more 'acks' will be better, but
there is no comments object to this patch
or any 'NAK' common for more then 3 months, maintainers should move to
next step.
Thanks,
- Kever
-Daniel
On 2020/7/7 下午7:25, Sandy Huang wrote:
don't mask possible_crtcs if remote-point is disabled.
Signed-off-by: Sandy Huang <hjc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c
index fdb05fbf72a0..565f05f5f11b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_of.c
@@ -66,6 +66,9 @@ uint32_t drm_of_find_possible_crtcs(struct drm_device *dev,
uint32_t possible_crtcs = 0;
for_each_endpoint_of_node(port, ep) {
+ if (!of_device_is_available(ep))
+ continue;
+
remote_port = of_graph_get_remote_port(ep);
if (!remote_port) {
of_node_put(ep);
Looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
