Hi all, On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 15:15:27 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 15:13:36 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in: > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h > > > > between commit: > > > > 59d7115dae02 ("drm/amdkfd: Move process doorbell allocation into kfd device") > > > > from the amdgpu tree and commit: > > > > c7b6bac9c72c ("drm, iommu: Change type of pasid to u32") > > > > from the tip tree. > > > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This > > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial > > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree > > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating > > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly > > complex conflicts. > > > > > > diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h > > index 739db04080d0,922ae138ab85..000000000000 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h > > @@@ -739,7 -723,8 +739,7 @@@ struct kfd_process > > /* We want to receive a notification when the mm_struct is destroyed */ > > struct mmu_notifier mmu_notifier; > > > > - uint16_t pasid; > > + u32 pasid; > > - unsigned int doorbell_index; > > > > /* > > * List of kfd_process_device structures, > > This is now a conflict between the tip tree and the drm tree. This is now a conflict between the drm tree and Linus' tree. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
Attachment:
pgpIkdIgphudo.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel