On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 07:12:24PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 6:53 PM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 07, 2020 at 06:44:18PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > >
> > > - /*
> > > - * While get_vaddr_frames() could be used for transient (kernel
> > > - * controlled lifetime) pinning of memory pages all current
> > > - * users establish long term (userspace controlled lifetime)
> > > - * page pinning. Treat get_vaddr_frames() like
> > > - * get_user_pages_longterm() and disallow it for filesystem-dax
> > > - * mappings.
> > > - */
> > > - if (vma_is_fsdax(vma)) {
> > > - ret = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > > - goto out;
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - if (!(vma->vm_flags & (VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP))) {
> > > - vec->got_ref = true;
> > > - vec->is_pfns = false;
> > > - ret = pin_user_pages_locked(start, nr_frames,
> > > - gup_flags, (struct page **)(vec->ptrs), &locked);
> > > - goto out;
> > > - }
> >
> > The vm_flags still need to be checked before going into the while
> > loop. If the break is taken then nothing would check vm_flags
>
> Hm right that's a bin inconsistent. follow_pfn also checks for this,
> so I think we can just ditch this entirely both here and in the do {}
> while () check, simplifying the latter to just while (vma). Well, just
> make it a real loop with less confusing control flow probably.
It does read very poorly with the redundant check, espeically since I
keep forgetting follow_pfn does it too :\
Jason
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
