On Tue, Oct 6, 2020 at 8:00 PM Chrisanthus, Anitha <anitha.chrisanthus@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Rob, > Thanks for the your prompt review. Please see my comments/questions inline. > For everything else, I can incorporate the changes in v2. > Anitha > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 6, 2020 2:08 PM > > To: Chrisanthus, Anitha <anitha.chrisanthus@xxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Paauwe, Bob J <bob.j.paauwe@xxxxxxxxx>; > > Dea, Edmund J <edmund.j.dea@xxxxxxxxx>; sam@xxxxxxxxxxxx; > > narmstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] dt-bindings: display: Add support for Intel KeemBay > > Display > > > > On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 07:21:02PM -0700, Anitha Chrisanthus wrote: > > > This patch adds bindings for Intel KeemBay Display > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Anitha Chrisanthus <anitha.chrisanthus@xxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > .../bindings/display/intel,kmb_display.yaml | 106 > > +++++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 106 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100644 > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/intel,kmb_display.yaml > > > > > > diff --git > > a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/intel,kmb_display.yaml > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/intel,kmb_display.yaml > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 0000000..65835cb > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/intel,kmb_display.yaml > > > @@ -0,0 +1,106 @@ > > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only > > > > check checkpatch.pl > > > > > +%YAML 1.2 > > > +--- > > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/intel,kmb_display.yaml# > > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > > > + > > > +title: Devicetree bindings for Intel Keem Bay display controller > > > + > > > +maintainers: > > > + - Anitha Chrisanthus <anitha.chrisanthus@xxxxxxxxx> > > > + - Edmond J Dea <edmund.j.dea@xxxxxxxxx> > > > + > > > +properties: > > > + compatible: > > > + const: intel,kmb_display > > > > 'keembay' was used elsewhere. Please be consistent. > > > > Don't use '_' either. > Please note that I cannot change the name at this point as there is a dependency on the u-boot firmware which loads the device tree. I can change the name to kmb-drm or keembay-display when updated firmware becomes available. That's unfortunate that you used bindings without a definition, but it doesn't matter. If that was fine, then we should just stop documenting bindings. > > > + reg: > > > + maxItems: 3 > > > > Can drop, implied. > > > > > + items: > > > + - description: Lcd registers range > > > + - description: Mipi registers range > > > + - description: Msscam registers range > > > > Is this really 1 h/w block? Don't really seem like it given addresses > > aren't adjacent, separate clocks, and MIPI blocks are often licensed IP. > Yes, these are part of the camera subsystem block of Intel Movidius Keembay SOC. Then where's the camera parts? The DT should reflect the h/w, not what's a convenient split for your drivers. > Please see https://lwn.net/Articles/833540/ This should be part of that series. Rob _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
