Am 07.10.20 um 13:43 schrieb Ruhl, Michael J:
-----Original Message-----
From: Christian König <ckoenig.leichtzumerken@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2020 4:52 AM
To: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; airlied@xxxxxxxxx;
ray.huang@xxxxxxx; Ruhl, Michael J <michael.j.ruhl@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/ttm: remove ttm_bo_unmap_virtual_locked
declaration
That was missed during the cleanup.
Signed-off-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
---
include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h | 9 ---------
1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
index 9897a16c0a9d..b58dedce7079 100644
--- a/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
+++ b/include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h
@@ -449,15 +449,6 @@ int ttm_bo_device_init(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev,
*/
void ttm_bo_unmap_virtual(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo);
-/**
- * ttm_bo_unmap_virtual
- *
- * @bo: tear down the virtual mappings for this BO
- *
- * The caller must take ttm_mem_io_lock before calling this function.
- */
-void ttm_bo_unmap_virtual_locked(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo);
greping for ttm_bo_unmap_virtual_locked revealed this:
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_page_dirty.c: * This is similar to ttm_bo_unmap_virtual_locked() except it takes a subrange.
include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_driver.h:void ttm_bo_unmap_virtual_locked(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo);
Should you clean up the vmwgvx comment to avoid confusion? 😊
Oh good point, thanks. Didn't know that the function was referenced
outside of TTM anywhere anymore.
Christian.
Reviewed-by: Michael J. Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@xxxxxxxxx>
m
-
/**
* ttm_bo_reserve:
*
--
2.17.1
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
