Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau: Drop mutex_lock_nested for atomic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 3:15 PM Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Ben, did you have a chance to look at this?

Ping
-Daniel

> On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 1:22 PM Maarten Lankhorst
> <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Op 02-08-2020 om 20:18 schreef Daniel Vetter:
> > > Purely conjecture, but I think the original locking inversion with the
> > > legacy page flip code between flipping and ttm's bo move function
> > > shoudn't exist anymore with atomic: With atomic the bo pinning and
> > > actual modeset commit is completely separated in the code patsh.
> > >
> > > This annotation was originally added in
> > >
> > > commit 060810d7abaabcab282e062c595871d661561400
> > > Author: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Date:   Mon Jul 8 14:15:51 2013 +1000
> > >
> > >     drm/nouveau: fix locking issues in page flipping paths
> > >
> > > due to
> > >
> > > commit b580c9e2b7ba5030a795aa2fb73b796523d65a78
> > > Author: Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Date:   Thu Jun 27 13:48:18 2013 +0200
> > >
> > >     drm/nouveau: make flipping lockdep safe
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > Cc: nouveau@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > ---
> > > I might be totally wrong, so this definitely needs testing :-)
> > >
> > > Cheers, Daniel
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c | 6 +++++-
> > >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> > > index 7806278dce57..a7b2a9bb0ffe 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
> > > @@ -776,7 +776,11 @@ nouveau_bo_move_m2mf(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, int evict, bool intr,
> > >                       return ret;
> > >       }
> > >
> > > -     mutex_lock_nested(&cli->mutex, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
> > > +     if (drm_drv_uses_atomic_modeset(drm->dev))
> > > +             mutex_lock(&cli->mutex);
> > > +     else
> > > +             mutex_lock_nested(&cli->mutex, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
> > > +
> > >       ret = nouveau_fence_sync(nouveau_bo(bo), chan, true, intr);
> > >       if (ret == 0) {
> > >               ret = drm->ttm.move(chan, bo, &bo->mem, new_reg);
> >
> > Well if you're certain it works now. :)
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
>
>
> --
> Daniel Vetter
> Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> http://blog.ffwll.ch



-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux