On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 03:59:04PM +0100, Dave Stevenson wrote: > Hi Maxime > > On Wed, 23 Sep 2020 at 09:40, Maxime Ripard <maxime@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > The current CRTC state reset hook in vc4 allocates a vc4_crtc_state > > structure as a drm_crtc_state, and relies on the fact that vc4_crtc_state > > embeds drm_crtc_state as its first member, and therefore can be safely > > casted. > > s/casted/cast > > > However, this is pretty fragile especially since there's no check for this > > in place, and we're going to need to access vc4_crtc_state member at reset > > so this looks like a good occasion to make it more robust. Also your next atomic_check will probably look at this, most definitely in the memcpy to take over the old state. So yeah KASAN should complain if you get this wrong :-) Probably want a Fixes: line for this too. -Daniel > > > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Tested-by: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Based on the issue I perceived with the previous patch, I'm happy. I > haven't thought about how the framework handles losing the state, but > that's not the driver's problem. > > There is still an implicit assumption that drm_crtc_state is the first > member from the implementation of to_vc4_crtc_state in vc4_drv.h. To > make it even more robust that could be a container_of instead. I > haven't checked for any other places that make the assumption though. > > Reviewed-by: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > > Changes from v1: > > - new patch > > --- > > drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_crtc.c | 13 ++++++++++--- > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_crtc.c > > index a393f93390a2..7ef20adedee5 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_crtc.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_crtc.c > > @@ -852,11 +852,18 @@ void vc4_crtc_destroy_state(struct drm_crtc *crtc, > > > > void vc4_crtc_reset(struct drm_crtc *crtc) > > { > > + struct vc4_crtc_state *vc4_crtc_state; > > + > > if (crtc->state) > > vc4_crtc_destroy_state(crtc, crtc->state); > > - crtc->state = kzalloc(sizeof(struct vc4_crtc_state), GFP_KERNEL); > > - if (crtc->state) > > - __drm_atomic_helper_crtc_reset(crtc, crtc->state); > > + > > + vc4_crtc_state = kzalloc(sizeof(*vc4_crtc_state), GFP_KERNEL); > > + if (!vc4_crtc_state) { > > + crtc->state = NULL; > > + return; > > + } > > + > > + __drm_atomic_helper_crtc_reset(crtc, &vc4_crtc_state->base); > > } > > > > static const struct drm_crtc_funcs vc4_crtc_funcs = { > > -- > > 2.26.2 > > > _______________________________________________ > dri-devel mailing list > dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel