On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 08:25:26PM +0530, Akhil P Oommen wrote: > In the case where we have a back-to-back submission that shares the same > BO, this BO will be prematurely moved to inactive_list while retiring the > first submit. But it will be still part of the second submit which is > being processed by the GPU. Now, if the shrinker happens to be triggered at > this point, it will result in a premature purging of this BO. > > To fix this, we need to refcount BO while doing submit and retire. Then, > it should be moved to inactive list when this refcount becomes 0. > > Signed-off-by: Akhil P Oommen <akhilpo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > Changes in v2: > 1. Keep Active List around > 2. Put back the deleted WARN_ON > > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h | 5 ++--- > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++---------------- > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.h | 4 +++- > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.c | 11 +++++++---- > 4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h > index 3193274..28e3c8d 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h > @@ -309,9 +309,8 @@ void msm_gem_put_vaddr(struct drm_gem_object *obj); > int msm_gem_madvise(struct drm_gem_object *obj, unsigned madv); > int msm_gem_sync_object(struct drm_gem_object *obj, > struct msm_fence_context *fctx, bool exclusive); > -void msm_gem_move_to_active(struct drm_gem_object *obj, > - struct msm_gpu *gpu, bool exclusive, struct dma_fence *fence); > -void msm_gem_move_to_inactive(struct drm_gem_object *obj); > +void msm_gem_active_get(struct drm_gem_object *obj, struct msm_gpu *gpu); > +void msm_gem_active_put(struct drm_gem_object *obj); > int msm_gem_cpu_prep(struct drm_gem_object *obj, uint32_t op, ktime_t *timeout); > int msm_gem_cpu_fini(struct drm_gem_object *obj); > void msm_gem_free_object(struct drm_gem_object *obj); > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c > index 76a6c52..14e14ca 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c > @@ -743,31 +743,31 @@ int msm_gem_sync_object(struct drm_gem_object *obj, > return 0; > } > > -void msm_gem_move_to_active(struct drm_gem_object *obj, > - struct msm_gpu *gpu, bool exclusive, struct dma_fence *fence) > +void msm_gem_active_get(struct drm_gem_object *obj, struct msm_gpu *gpu) > { > struct msm_gem_object *msm_obj = to_msm_bo(obj); > + WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&obj->dev->struct_mutex)); > WARN_ON(msm_obj->madv != MSM_MADV_WILLNEED); > - msm_obj->gpu = gpu; > - if (exclusive) > - dma_resv_add_excl_fence(obj->resv, fence); > - else > - dma_resv_add_shared_fence(obj->resv, fence); > - list_del_init(&msm_obj->mm_list); > - list_add_tail(&msm_obj->mm_list, &gpu->active_list); > + > + if (!atomic_fetch_inc(&msm_obj->active_count)) { > + msm_obj->gpu = gpu; > + list_del_init(&msm_obj->mm_list); > + list_add_tail(&msm_obj->mm_list, &gpu->active_list); > + } I'm not sure if all the renaming and reorganization are really needed here - this is the meat of the change and it would have fit in reasonably well with the existing function design. > } > > -void msm_gem_move_to_inactive(struct drm_gem_object *obj) > +void msm_gem_active_put(struct drm_gem_object *obj) > { > - struct drm_device *dev = obj->dev; > - struct msm_drm_private *priv = dev->dev_private; > struct msm_gem_object *msm_obj = to_msm_bo(obj); > + struct msm_drm_private *priv = obj->dev->dev_private; > > - WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&dev->struct_mutex)); > + WARN_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&obj->dev->struct_mutex)); > > - msm_obj->gpu = NULL; > - list_del_init(&msm_obj->mm_list); > - list_add_tail(&msm_obj->mm_list, &priv->inactive_list); > + if (!atomic_dec_return(&msm_obj->active_count)) { > + msm_obj->gpu = NULL; > + list_del_init(&msm_obj->mm_list); > + list_add_tail(&msm_obj->mm_list, &priv->inactive_list); > + } Same. Jordan > } > > int msm_gem_cpu_prep(struct drm_gem_object *obj, uint32_t op, ktime_t *timeout) > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.h > index 7b1c7a5..a1bf741 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.h > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.h > @@ -88,12 +88,14 @@ struct msm_gem_object { > struct mutex lock; /* Protects resources associated with bo */ > > char name[32]; /* Identifier to print for the debugfs files */ > + > + atomic_t active_count; > }; > #define to_msm_bo(x) container_of(x, struct msm_gem_object, base) > > static inline bool is_active(struct msm_gem_object *msm_obj) > { > - return msm_obj->gpu != NULL; > + return atomic_read(&msm_obj->active_count); > } > > static inline bool is_purgeable(struct msm_gem_object *msm_obj) > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.c > index 29c8d73c..55d1648 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gpu.c > @@ -698,8 +698,8 @@ static void retire_submit(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct msm_ringbuffer *ring, > > for (i = 0; i < submit->nr_bos; i++) { > struct msm_gem_object *msm_obj = submit->bos[i].obj; > - /* move to inactive: */ > - msm_gem_move_to_inactive(&msm_obj->base); > + > + msm_gem_active_put(&msm_obj->base); > msm_gem_unpin_iova(&msm_obj->base, submit->aspace); > drm_gem_object_put_locked(&msm_obj->base); > } > @@ -774,6 +774,7 @@ void msm_gpu_submit(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct msm_gem_submit *submit) > > for (i = 0; i < submit->nr_bos; i++) { > struct msm_gem_object *msm_obj = submit->bos[i].obj; > + struct drm_gem_object *drm_obj = &msm_obj->base; > uint64_t iova; > > /* can't happen yet.. but when we add 2d support we'll have > @@ -786,9 +787,11 @@ void msm_gpu_submit(struct msm_gpu *gpu, struct msm_gem_submit *submit) > msm_gem_get_and_pin_iova(&msm_obj->base, submit->aspace, &iova); > > if (submit->bos[i].flags & MSM_SUBMIT_BO_WRITE) > - msm_gem_move_to_active(&msm_obj->base, gpu, true, submit->fence); > + dma_resv_add_excl_fence(drm_obj->resv, submit->fence); > else if (submit->bos[i].flags & MSM_SUBMIT_BO_READ) > - msm_gem_move_to_active(&msm_obj->base, gpu, false, submit->fence); > + dma_resv_add_shared_fence(drm_obj->resv, submit->fence); > + > + msm_gem_active_get(drm_obj, gpu); > } > > gpu->funcs->submit(gpu, submit); > -- > 2.7.4 > -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel