I'm really not awake yet ...
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 10:17 AM Pekka Paalanen <ppaalanen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 20:18:34 +0200
> Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > When doing an atomic modeset with ALLOW_MODESET drivers are allowed to
> > pull in arbitrary other resources, including CRTCs (e.g. when
> > reconfiguring global resources).
> >
> > But in nonblocking mode userspace has then no idea this happened,
> > which can lead to spurious EBUSY calls, both:
> > - when that other CRTC is currently busy doing a page_flip the
> > ALLOW_MODESET commit can fail with an EBUSY
> > - on the other CRTC a normal atomic flip can fail with EBUSY because
> > of the additional commit inserted by the kernel without userspace's
> > knowledge
> >
> > For blocking commits this isn't a problem, because everyone else will
> > just block until all the CRTC are reconfigured. Only thing userspace
> > can notice is the dropped frames without any reason for why frames got
> > dropped.
> >
> > Consensus is that we need new uapi to handle this properly, but no one
> > has any idea what exactly the new uapi should look like. Since this
> > has been shipping for years already compositors need to deal no matter
> > what, so as a first step just try to enforce this across drivers
> > better with some checks.
> >
> > v2: Add comments and a WARN_ON to enforce this only when allowed - we
> > don't want to silently convert page flips into blocking plane updates
> > just because the driver is buggy.
> >
> > v3: Fix inverted WARN_ON (Pekka).
> >
> > v4: Drop the uapi changes, only add a WARN_ON for now to enforce some
> > rules for drivers.
>
> Dropped all addresses, because gmail refused to send this email
> otherwise.
>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> > index 58527f151984..ef106e7153a6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c
> > @@ -281,6 +281,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__drm_atomic_state_free);
> > * needed. It will also grab the relevant CRTC lock to make sure that the state
> > * is consistent.
> > *
> > + * WARNING: Drivers may only add new CRTC states to a @state if
> > + * drm_atomic_state.allow_modeset is set, or if it's a driver-internal commit
> > + * not created by userspace through an IOCTL call.
> > + *
> > * Returns:
> > *
> > * Either the allocated state or the error code encoded into the pointer. When
> > @@ -1262,10 +1266,15 @@ int drm_atomic_check_only(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> > struct drm_crtc_state *new_crtc_state;
> > struct drm_connector *conn;
> > struct drm_connector_state *conn_state;
> > + unsigned requested_crtc = 0;
> > + unsigned affected_crtc = 0;
> > int i, ret = 0;
> >
> > DRM_DEBUG_ATOMIC("checking %p\n", state);
> >
> > + for_each_new_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, old_crtc_state, i)
> > + requested_crtc |= drm_crtc_mask(crtc);
> > +
> > for_each_oldnew_plane_in_state(state, plane, old_plane_state, new_plane_state, i) {
> > ret = drm_atomic_plane_check(old_plane_state, new_plane_state);
> > if (ret) {
> > @@ -1313,6 +1322,24 @@ int drm_atomic_check_only(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > + for_each_new_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, old_crtc_state, i)
> > + affected_crtc |= drm_crtc_mask(crtc);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * For commits that allow modesets drivers can add other CRTCs to the
> > + * atomic commit, e.g. when they need to reallocate global resources.
> > + * This can cause spurious EBUSY, which robs compositors of a very
> > + * effective sanity check for their drawing loop. Therefor only allow
> > + * this for modeset commits.
> > + *
> > + * FIXME: Should add affected_crtc mask to the ATOMIC IOCTL as an output
> > + * so compositors know what's going on.
>
> Hi,
>
> I think telling userspace the affected_crtc mask would only solve half
> of the problem: it would allow userspace to avoid attempting flips on
> the other affected CRTCs until this modeset is done, but it doesn't
> stop this non-blocking modeset from EBUSY'ing because other affected
> CRTCs are busy flipping.
>
> If the aim is to indicate userspace bugs with EBUSY, then EBUSY because
> of other CRTCs needs to be differentiable from EBUSY due to a mistake
> on this CRTC. Maybe the CRTC mask should instead be "conflicting/busy
> CRTCs", not simply "affected CRTCS"?
>
> Userspace might also be designed to always avoid modesets while any
> CRTC is busy flipping. In that case any EBUSY would be an indication of
> a (userspace) bug and a "busy CRTCs" mask could help pinpoint the issue.
>
> If userspace does a TEST_ONLY commit with a modeset on one CRTC and the
> driver pulls in another CRTC that is currently busy, will the test
> commit return with EBUSY?
>
> If yes, and *if* userspace is single-threaded wrt. to KMS updates,
> that might offer a way to work around it in userspace. But if userspace
> is flipping other CRTCs from other threads, TEST_ONLY commit does not
> help because another thread may cut in and make a CRTC busy.
This is not a legit programming model for atomic. An atomic commit is
always relative to the current state. If that state changes, then you
need to re-run your TEST_ONLY commit. So multiple threads changing
state in parallel isn't really a good idea anyway. Minimally we'd need
some kind of TEST_ONLY pile-up, so you can validate a change assuming
another commit has already happened. That's even harder than deep
queues on the commit side, we'd probably need full rollback of
commits.
-Daniel
>
>
> Thanks,
> pq
>
> > + */
> > + if (affected_crtc != requested_crtc) {
> > + /* adding other CRTC is only allowed for modeset commits */
> > + WARN_ON(!state->allow_modeset);
> > + }
> > +
> > return 0;
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_atomic_check_only);
>
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
