The double invocations are incorrect but seem to be safe so I don't think this will fix any bugs. Before: [ 7.639366] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0 [ 7.639377] drm_prime_init_file ee3675d0 [ 7.639507] drm_prime_destroy_file ee3675d0 [ 7.639518] drm_prime_destroy_file ee3675d0 [ 7.639802] drm_prime_init_file ee372390 [ 7.639810] drm_prime_init_file ee372390 [ 8.473316] drm_prime_init_file ee356390 [ 8.473331] drm_prime_init_file ee356390 After: [ 6.363842] drm_prime_init_file edc2e5d0 [ 6.363994] drm_prime_destroy_file edc2e5d0 [ 6.364260] drm_prime_init_file edc2e750 [ 8.004837] drm_prime_init_file ee36ded0 Signed-off-by: Mandeep Singh Baines <msb@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c | 2 -- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c index ebacec6..a27b8ff 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/exynos/exynos_drm_drv.c @@ -160,7 +160,6 @@ static int exynos_drm_open(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_file *file) if (!file_priv) return -ENOMEM; - drm_prime_init_file_private(&file->prime); file->driver_priv = file_priv; return exynos_drm_subdrv_open(dev, file); @@ -184,7 +183,6 @@ static void exynos_drm_preclose(struct drm_device *dev, e->base.destroy(&e->base); } } - drm_prime_destroy_file_private(&file->prime); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->event_lock, flags); exynos_drm_subdrv_close(dev, file); -- 1.7.7.3 _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
