On 06.09.2012 15:01, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Don, 2012-09-06 at 13:46 +0200, Christian König wrote:
On 06.09.2012 12:53, Michel Dänzer wrote:
From: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@xxxxxxx>
Sounds good to me, but shouldn't we also increase the version number?
Assuming you mean the libdrm package version, I don't think it's worth
doing that just for these fixes. At this point, one should always use
latest Git of mesa and libdrm for radeonsi. But of course, once a libdrm
release is out with these fixes, we can require that as the minimum
version for radeonsi.
Ok, that makes sense.
Anyway: Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx>
Thanks, is that for the whole series?
Yes it is, and also for the four patches to radeonsi which depends on
this change.
Christian.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
