On Don, 2012-09-06 at 13:46 +0200, Christian König wrote: > On 06.09.2012 12:53, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > From: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@xxxxxxx> > > > > Signed-off-by: Michel Dänzer <michel.daenzer@xxxxxxx> > Sounds good to me, but shouldn't we also increase the version number? Assuming you mean the libdrm package version, I don't think it's worth doing that just for these fixes. At this point, one should always use latest Git of mesa and libdrm for radeonsi. But of course, once a libdrm release is out with these fixes, we can require that as the minimum version for radeonsi. > Anyway: Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> Thanks, is that for the whole series? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
