Re: [PATCH 4/5] drm_dp_cec: add plumbing in preparation for MST support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/09/2020 08:22, Sam McNally wrote:
> From: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@xxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@xxxxxxxxx>
> [sammc@xxxxxxxxxxxx:
>  - rebased
>  - removed polling-related changes
>  - moved the calls to drm_dp_cec_(un)set_edid() into the next patch
> ]
> Signed-off-by: Sam McNally <sammc@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> 
>  .../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c   |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_cec.c                  | 22 ++++++++++---------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c       |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_connector.c   |  2 +-
>  include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h                   |  6 +++--
>  5 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c
> index 461fa4da0a34..6e7075893ec9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c
> @@ -419,7 +419,7 @@ void amdgpu_dm_initialize_dp_connector(struct amdgpu_display_manager *dm,
>  
>  	drm_dp_aux_init(&aconnector->dm_dp_aux.aux);
>  	drm_dp_cec_register_connector(&aconnector->dm_dp_aux.aux,
> -				      &aconnector->base);
> +				      &aconnector->base, false);
>  
>  	if (aconnector->base.connector_type == DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP)
>  		return;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_cec.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_cec.c
> index 3ab2609f9ec7..04ab7b88055c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_cec.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_cec.c
> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>  #include <drm/drm_connector.h>
>  #include <drm/drm_device.h>
>  #include <drm/drm_dp_helper.h>
> +#include <drm/drm_dp_mst_helper.h>
>  
>  /*
>   * Unfortunately it turns out that we have a chicken-and-egg situation
> @@ -338,8 +339,6 @@ void drm_dp_cec_set_edid(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, const struct edid *edid)
>  	if (aux->cec.adap) {
>  		if (aux->cec.adap->capabilities == cec_caps &&
>  		    aux->cec.adap->available_log_addrs == num_las) {
> -			/* Unchanged, so just set the phys addr */
> -			cec_s_phys_addr_from_edid(aux->cec.adap, edid);
>  			goto unlock;
>  		}
>  		/*
> @@ -364,15 +363,16 @@ void drm_dp_cec_set_edid(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, const struct edid *edid)
>  	if (cec_register_adapter(aux->cec.adap, connector->dev->dev)) {
>  		cec_delete_adapter(aux->cec.adap);
>  		aux->cec.adap = NULL;
> -	} else {
> -		/*
> -		 * Update the phys addr for the new CEC adapter. When called
> -		 * from drm_dp_cec_register_connector() edid == NULL, so in
> -		 * that case the phys addr is just invalidated.
> -		 */
> -		cec_s_phys_addr_from_edid(aux->cec.adap, edid);
>  	}
>  unlock:
> +	/*
> +	 * Update the phys addr for the new CEC adapter. When called
> +	 * from drm_dp_cec_register_connector() edid == NULL, so in
> +	 * that case the phys addr is just invalidated.
> +	 */

The comment is no longer in sync with the code: if EDID == NULL, then
nothing is done due to the edid check in the 'if' below.

> +	if (aux->cec.adap && edid) {

I think this should just be: if (aux->cec.adap)

Also, the {} aren't necessary here.

> +		cec_s_phys_addr_from_edid(aux->cec.adap, edid);
> +	}
>  	mutex_unlock(&aux->cec.lock);
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_cec_set_edid);

Frankly, the changes to this function should be dropped completely, from
what I can see they are not necessary. It was done in my original patch
because of the way I handled mst, but you did it differently (and I think
better), so these changes are no longer needed.

I know I am actually commenting on my old patch, but that patch was from a
work-in-progress git branch and was never meant as a 'proper' patch.

However, what complicates matters is that after digging a bit more I discovered
that commit 732300154980 ("drm: Do not call drm_dp_cec_set_edid() while registering
DP connectors") changed drm_dp_cec_register_connector() so that it no longer
calls drm_dp_cec_set_edid(), but the comments there and in this function were
not updated. It would be nice if you can add a patch fixing these outdated
comments.

Regardless of that change in commit 732300154980, the edid pointer can still be
NULL and the existing behavior should be kept (i.e. create a CEC device, but with
an invalid physical address since there is no EDID for some reason).

Regards,

	Hans

> @@ -418,6 +418,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_cec_unset_edid);
>   * drm_dp_cec_register_connector() - register a new connector
>   * @aux: DisplayPort AUX channel
>   * @connector: drm connector
> + * @is_mst: set to true if this is an MST branch
>   *
>   * A new connector was registered with associated CEC adapter name and
>   * CEC adapter parent device. After registering the name and parent
> @@ -425,12 +426,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_dp_cec_unset_edid);
>   * CEC and to register a CEC adapter if that is the case.
>   */
>  void drm_dp_cec_register_connector(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
> -				   struct drm_connector *connector)
> +				   struct drm_connector *connector, bool is_mst)
>  {
>  	WARN_ON(aux->cec.adap);
>  	if (WARN_ON(!aux->transfer))
>  		return;
>  	aux->cec.connector = connector;
> +	aux->cec.is_mst = is_mst;
>  	INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&aux->cec.unregister_work,
>  			  drm_dp_cec_unregister_work);
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> index 82b9de274f65..744cb55572f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> @@ -6261,7 +6261,7 @@ intel_dp_connector_register(struct drm_connector *connector)
>  	intel_dp->aux.dev = connector->kdev;
>  	ret = drm_dp_aux_register(&intel_dp->aux);
>  	if (!ret)
> -		drm_dp_cec_register_connector(&intel_dp->aux, connector);
> +		drm_dp_cec_register_connector(&intel_dp->aux, connector, false);
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_connector.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_connector.c
> index 49dd0cbc332f..671a70e95cd1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_connector.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_connector.c
> @@ -1414,7 +1414,7 @@ nouveau_connector_create(struct drm_device *dev,
>  	switch (type) {
>  	case DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DisplayPort:
>  	case DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_eDP:
> -		drm_dp_cec_register_connector(&nv_connector->aux, connector);
> +		drm_dp_cec_register_connector(&nv_connector->aux, connector, false);
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> index 85513eeb2196..12bca1b9512b 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> @@ -1495,12 +1495,14 @@ struct drm_connector;
>   * @lock: mutex protecting this struct
>   * @adap: the CEC adapter for CEC-Tunneling-over-AUX support.
>   * @connector: the connector this CEC adapter is associated with
> + * @is_mst: this is an MST branch
>   * @unregister_work: unregister the CEC adapter
>   */
>  struct drm_dp_aux_cec {
>  	struct mutex lock;
>  	struct cec_adapter *adap;
>  	struct drm_connector *connector;
> +	bool is_mst;
>  	struct delayed_work unregister_work;
>  };
>  
> @@ -1746,7 +1748,7 @@ drm_dp_has_quirk(const struct drm_dp_desc *desc, u32 edid_quirks,
>  #ifdef CONFIG_DRM_DP_CEC
>  void drm_dp_cec_irq(struct drm_dp_aux *aux);
>  void drm_dp_cec_register_connector(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
> -				   struct drm_connector *connector);
> +				   struct drm_connector *connector, bool is_mst);
>  void drm_dp_cec_unregister_connector(struct drm_dp_aux *aux);
>  void drm_dp_cec_set_edid(struct drm_dp_aux *aux, const struct edid *edid);
>  void drm_dp_cec_unset_edid(struct drm_dp_aux *aux);
> @@ -1757,7 +1759,7 @@ static inline void drm_dp_cec_irq(struct drm_dp_aux *aux)
>  
>  static inline void
>  drm_dp_cec_register_connector(struct drm_dp_aux *aux,
> -			      struct drm_connector *connector)
> +			      struct drm_connector *connector, bool is_mst)
>  {
>  }
>  
> 

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux