Hi Tomi,
On 02.09.2020 10:00, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 01/09/2020 22:33, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> On 2020-08-26 07:32, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>>> The Documentation/DMA-API-HOWTO.txt states that the dma_map_sg() function
>>> returns the number of the created entries in the DMA address space.
>>> However the subsequent calls to the dma_sync_sg_for_{device,cpu}() and
>>> dma_unmap_sg must be called with the original number of the entries
>>> passed to the dma_map_sg().
>>>
>>> struct sg_table is a common structure used for describing a non-contiguous
>>> memory buffer, used commonly in the DRM and graphics subsystems. It
>>> consists of a scatterlist with memory pages and DMA addresses (sgl entry),
>>> as well as the number of scatterlist entries: CPU pages (orig_nents entry)
>>> and DMA mapped pages (nents entry).
>>>
>>> It turned out that it was a common mistake to misuse nents and orig_nents
>>> entries, calling DMA-mapping functions with a wrong number of entries or
>>> ignoring the number of mapped entries returned by the dma_map_sg()
>>> function.
>>>
>>> Fix the code to refer to proper nents or orig_nents entries. This driver
>>> checks for a buffer contiguity in DMA address space, so it should test
>>> sg_table->nents entry.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_gem.c | 6 +++---
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_gem.c
>>> index ff0c4b0c3fd0..a7a9a0afe2b6 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_gem.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_gem.c
>>> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ struct omap_gem_object {
>>> * OMAP_BO_MEM_DMA_API flag set)
>>> *
>>> * - buffers imported from dmabuf (with the OMAP_BO_MEM_DMABUF flag set)
>>> - * if they are physically contiguous (when sgt->orig_nents == 1)
>>> + * if they are physically contiguous (when sgt->nents == 1)
>> Hmm, if this really does mean *physically* contiguous - i.e. if buffers might be shared between
>> DMA-translatable and non-DMA-translatable devices - then these changes might not be appropriate. If
>> not and it only actually means DMA-contiguous, then it would be good to clarify the comments to that
>> effect.
>>
>> Can anyone familiar with omapdrm clarify what exactly the case is here? I know that IOMMUs might be
>> involved to some degree, and I've skimmed the interconnect chapters of enough OMAP TRMs to be scared
>> by the reference to the tiler aperture in the context below :)
> DSS (like many other IPs in OMAP) does not have any MMU/PAT, and can only use contiguous buffers
> (contiguous in the RAM).
>
> There's a special case with TILER (which is not part of DSS but of the memory subsystem, but it's
> still handled internally by the omapdrm driver), which has a PAT. PAT can create a contiguous view
> of scattered pages, and DSS can then use this contiguous view ("tiler aperture", which to DSS looks
> just like normal contiguous memory).
>
> Note that omapdrm does not use dma_map_sg() & co. mentioned in the patch description.
>
> If there's no MMU/PAT, is orig_nents always the same as nents? Or can we have multiple physically
> contiguous pages listed separately in the sgt (so orig_nents > 1) but as the pages form one big
> contiguous area, nents == 1?
Well, when DMA-mapping API is properly used, the difference between
nents and orig_nents is only when the scatterlist have been mapped for DMA.
For the mentioned case, even if the creator of the buffer used only the
pages that are consecutive in the physical memory, he is free to chose
either to set nents/orig_nents to 1 and length to n*PAGE_SIZE or set
nents/orig_nents to n and length to PAGE_SIZE for each. Then the buffer
chunks might be merged, but this is done by the DMA-mapping code. For
your case, without any call to DMA-mapping, you can only assume that the
buffer is contiguous in physical memory if orig_nents is 1.
I've changed the use of nents to orig_nents to make things consistent -
this code operates only on the unmapped buffers. I want to ensure that
anyone who will potentially copy this code, won't make the
nents/orig_nents mistake in the future.
If you don't like it, we can drop this patch, because it won't change
the way the driver works.
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
