> It seems that 0-day picks up new semantic patches that are added to trees > in kernel.org, but that it's strategy for generating the patch is not > ideal. I'll just drop these Fixes lines. * How do you think about to adjust also the prefix for subjects of generated patches? Another example: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-nvme/alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2008272211260.2482@hadrien/ https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1296616/ https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/8/27/1377 * Do any scripts (from the continuous integration system) need further improvements for the safe and clear application of patch results? Regards, Markus _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
