On Fri, Aug 28, 2020 at 07:48:48PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 28-08-20, 15:04, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>
> > +#define EDID_BLOCK_SIZE 128
> > +#define EDID_NUM_BLOCKS 2
>
> tab or space either one, not both ;)
>
> > +static struct mipi_dsi_device *lt9611uxc_attach_dsi(struct lt9611uxc *lt9611uxc,
> > + struct device_node *dsi_node)
>
> Please align this with open parenthesis of preceding line (checkpatch
> with --strict option will check this)
>
> > +static int lt9611uxc_bridge_attach(struct drm_bridge *bridge,
> > + enum drm_bridge_attach_flags flags)
> > +{
> > + struct lt9611uxc *lt9611uxc = bridge_to_lt9611uxc(bridge);
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + if (!(flags & DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR)) {
> > + dev_err(lt9611uxc->dev, "Fix bridge driver to make connector optional!");
>
> Can we support both modes as I have done in lt9611, that way once the
> conversion is done we can drop the init part and support conversion.
I was going to mention that :-) New drivers should support the
DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR flag.
> I have patch for msm driver to set DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR, you
> can use that to test
>
> > +static int lt9611uxc_hdmi_hw_params(struct device *dev, void *data,
> > + struct hdmi_codec_daifmt *fmt,
> > + struct hdmi_codec_params *hparms)
> > +{
> > + /*
> > + * LT9611UXC will automatically detect rate and sample size, so no need
> > + * to setup anything here.
> > + */
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
> Do we need dummy function?
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
