On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 10:17 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 10:31:41PM +0530, Amit Pundir wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 at 21:34, Greg Kroah-Hartman > > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 09:31:27AM -0400, Laura Abbott wrote: > > > > On 8/27/20 8:36 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > > > The ION android code has long been marked to be removed, now that we > > > > > dma-buf support merged into the real part of the kernel. > > > > > > > > > > It was thought that we could wait to remove the ion kernel at a later > > > > > time, but as the out-of-tree Android fork of the ion code has diverged > > > > > quite a bit, and any Android device using the ion interface uses that > > > > > forked version and not this in-tree version, the in-tree copy of the > > > > > code is abandonded and not used by anyone. > > > > > > > > > > Combine this abandoned codebase with the need to make changes to it in > > > > > order to keep the kernel building properly, which then causes merge > > > > > issues when merging those changes into the out-of-tree Android code, and > > > > > you end up with two different groups of people (the in-kernel-tree > > > > > developers, and the Android kernel developers) who are both annoyed at > > > > > the current situation. Because of this problem, just drop the in-kernel > > > > > copy of the ion code now, as it's not used, and is only causing problems > > > > > for everyone involved. > > > > > > > > > > Cc: "Arve Hjønnevåg" <arve@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@xxxxxxx> > > > > > Cc: Christian Brauner <christian@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Cc: Hridya Valsaraju <hridya@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Cc: Laura Abbott <laura@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Cc: Martijn Coenen <maco@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Cc: Todd Kjos <tkjos@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Cc: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > Cc: linaro-mm-sig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > > > We discussed this at the Android MC on Monday and the plan was to > > > > remove it after the next LTS release. > > > > > > I know it was discussed, my point is that it is actually causing > > > problems now (with developers who want to change the internal kernel api > > > hitting issues, and newbies trying to clean up code in ways that isn't > > > exactly optimal wasting maintainer cycles), and that anyone who uses > > > this code, is not actually using this version of the code. Everyone who > > > relies on ion right now, is using the version that is in the Android > > > common kernel tree, which has diverged from this in-kernel way quite a > > > bit now for the reason that we didn't want to take any of those new > > > features in the in-kernel version. > > > > > > So this is a problem that we have caused by just wanting to wait, no one > > > is using this code, combined with it causing problems for the upstream > > > developers. > > > > > > There is nothing "magic" about the last kernel of the year that requires > > > this code to sit here until then. At that point in time, all users > > > will, again, be using the forked Android kernel version, and if we > > > delete this now here, that fork can remain just fine, with the added > > > benifit of it reducing developer workloads here in-kernel. > > > > > > So why wait? > > > > Hi, > > > > I don't know what is the right thing to do here. I just want to > > highlight that AOSP's audio (codec2) HAL depends on the ION system > > heap and it will break AOSP for people who boot mainline on their > > devices, even for just testing purpose like we do in Linaro. Right now > > we need only 1 (Android specific out-of-tree) patch to boot AOSP with > > mainline and Sumit is already trying to upstream that vma naming > > patch. Removal of in-kernel ION, will just add more to that delta. > > As AOSP will continue to rely on ION after December of this year, all > you are doing is postponing the inevitable a few more months. > > Push back on the Android team to fix up the code to not use ION, they > know this needs to happen. > Hi all, We are currently working with the codec2 team to transition codec2 to use libdmabufheap instead of libion. It will definitely happen during the Android S timeframe. Thanks, Hridya > thanks, > > greg k-h _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
