On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 2:36 PM John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 4:46 AM Mauro Carvalho Chehab > <mchehab+huawei@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > So, IMO, the best is to keep it on staging for a while, until those > > remaining bugs gets solved. > > > > I added this series, together with the regulator driver and > > a few other patches (including a hack to fix a Kernel 5.8 > > regression at WiFi ) at: > > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mchehab_kernel/hikey-970/-/commits/master > > Sorry, one more small request: Could you create a branch that only has > the DRM driver changes in it? > > The reason I ask, is that since the HiKey960 isn't affected by the > majority of the problems you listed as motivation for going through > staging. So if we can validate that your tree works fine on HiKey960, > the series can be cleaned up and submitted properly upstream to enable > that SoC, and the outstanding 970 issues can be worked out afterwards > against mainline. Just as a heads up, I tried testing your tree with my HiKey960, and after fixing the compat string inconsistency, the drivers seem to load properly. However the drm_hwcomposer seems to have some trouble with the driver: 01-01 00:12:41.456 345 345 E hwc-drm-display-compositor: Commit test failed for display 0, FIXME 01-01 00:12:41.456 345 345 E hwc-drm-two: Failed to apply the frame composition ret=-22 01-01 00:12:41.456 351 351 E HWComposer: presentAndGetReleaseFences: present failed for display 0: BadParameter (4) I'll dig in a bit further as to why, but wanted to give you a heads up. thanks -john _______________________________________________ dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
