Hi,
i've printed the mtk_comp_id after the modification-loops...
[ 5.480848] main:
[ 5.480851] DDP_COMPONENT_OVL0
[ 5.482776] DDP_COMPONENT_RDMA0
[ 5.485827] DDP_COMPONENT_COLOR0
[ 5.488978] DDP_COMPONENT_BLS
[ 5.492206] DDP_COMPONENT_DPI0
[ 5.495170] ext:
[ 5.498233] DDP_COMPONENT_RDMA1
[ 5.500068] DDP_COMPONENT_DPI0
so only the main-path was replaced with DPI at the end. so currently the DSI is not connected (or i move it to ext). have now added new structs for mt7623 with swapped DPI0/DSI0 and commented out the code from Patch 1...compatible was already mt7623 with 2701 as fallback, so no dts-change needed...
now i need to look which changes in dts can be dropped...at least the bls=>dpi, right?
regards Frank
> Gesendet: Montag, 03. August 2020 um 18:27 Uhr
> Von: "Chun-Kuang Hu" <chunkuang.hu@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Yes, this is what I mean, but I think it need not output to pmw.
> But now I have a solution that you need not to modify binding document.
> Because now mt7623 has a different routing than mt2701, and this
> patch's approach is to use different port setting in each device tree.
> My solution is that these two SoC has different compatible string:
> "mediatek,mt7623-mmsys" and "mediatek,mt2701-mmsys". For now,
> "mediatek,mt2701-mmsys" has its data as
>
> static const struct mtk_mmsys_driver_data mt2701_mmsys_driver_data = {
> .main_path = mt2701_mtk_ddp_main,
> .main_len = ARRAY_SIZE(mt2701_mtk_ddp_main),
> .ext_path = mt2701_mtk_ddp_ext,
> .ext_len = ARRAY_SIZE(mt2701_mtk_ddp_ext),
> .shadow_register = true,
> };
>
> I think you could create a data for "mediatek,mt7623-mmsys" which has
> a different routing.
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
