Quoting harigovi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (2020-06-29 06:50:09)
> On 2020-06-25 06:37, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Harigovindan P (2020-02-17 00:58:42)
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts
> >> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts
> >> index 388f50ad4fde..349db8fe78a5 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts
> >> @@ -232,6 +233,57 @@ vreg_bob: bob {
[...]
> >> + ports {
> >> + port@1 {
> >> + endpoint {
> >> + remote-endpoint = <&panel0_in>;
> >> + data-lanes = <0 1 2 3>;
> >
> > Is this property needed? If it's the default assumption it would be
> > nice
> > to omit it so that we don't have to think about it.
> > This property is needed during panel probe. If this is not mentioned
> > here,
> mipi_dsi_attach() will fail during panel probe. In dsi_host.c,
> dsi_host_attach()
> fails since dsi lanes are greater than msm_host lanes. msm_host lanes
> are updated
> as part of dsi_host_parse_dt. If we dont provide data-lanes in dt, it'll
> have default
> value and fail in dsi_host_attach().
What is the default value? It looks like dsi_host_parse_dt() says it's
using a default but I guess the default is 0 lanes? Why not make it the
normal 4 lanes?
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
