Re: sw_sync deadlock avoidance, take 3

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Bas Nieuwenhuizen (2020-07-15 11:23:35)
> Hi Chris,
> 
> My concern with going in this direction was that we potentially allow
> an application to allocate a lot of kernel memory but not a lot of fds
> by creating lots of fences and then closing the fds but never
> signaling them. Is that not an issue?

I did look to see if there was a quick way we could couple into the
sync_file release itself to remove the syncpt from the timeline, but
decided that for a debug feature, it wasn't a pressing concern.

Maybe now is the time to ask: are you using sw_sync outside of
validation?
-Chris
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Linux DRI Users]     [Linux Intel Graphics]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux